Skip to content
Feature: TAM ReportsFlagship

The monthly proof that keeps the quarterly review honest

A lighter, monthly version of the vCIO Report: technical evidence and accept/decline recommendations that flow straight into the next QBR.

The problem

A lot happens between quarterly reviews that never gets recorded

Three months is a long gap. Fixes get made that nobody gets credit for. New risks appear that don't surface until the next QBR, sometimes months after they mattered. Without a monthly touchpoint, the quarterly review starts from a blank page every time.

TAM Monthly Review cover example: client alignment percentage, monthly change and recommendation count

Example output from a demo account, not a real customer's data.

How it works

The same engine, run monthly, with a technical edge

TAM Reports use the same alignment engine as the vCIO Report (same baseline, same compliance frameworks) but run monthly, and add device-level detail the quarterly review doesn't need to carry. Each finding is framed as a straightforward accept-or-decline decision.

  • Same alignment scoring and 6-framework compliance view, refreshed monthly
  • Adds Flagged Assets: per-device issues tagged by RAM, warranty, OS, lifecycle, disk and CPU
  • Recommendations presented with finding, business impact, effort level, and a clear accept/decline ask
  • Explicitly hands off to the vCIO Report, closing with open deviations, recommendations and critical/high counts passed forward
TAM Monthly Review overview example: estate alignment, alignment trend, reactive hours per endpoint, compliance, flagged assets, recommendations and roadmap

Example output from a demo account, not a real customer's data.

How it works: a relationship touch

Not just a numbers dump

Each monthly review also carries one relevant, non-salesy item for the client: a short webinar or piece of guidance tied to what's in that month's findings. It keeps the report feeling like an ongoing relationship, not a compliance chore.

  • One curated, relevant item per month, flagged clearly as informational and not a pitch
  • Tied to the alignment gaps raised that month, so it's useful context, not filler
Flagged assets example: devices tagged with warranty, RAM, OS, lifecycle, disk and CPU flags

Example output from a demo account, not a real customer's data.

The outcome

The QBR opens with three months of evidence already agreed

Because everything is captured and actioned monthly, the quarterly review stops being a rebuild-from-memory exercise. It opens with an agreed, evidenced position, and the vCIO conversation moves straight to priority, sequencing and investment.

  • Nothing lost between quarters: every fix and every new risk has a monthly record
  • The QBR starts from evidence, not from scratch
  • A consistent monthly cadence clients can set their calendar by

See a month's worth of evidence in one report

Book a walkthrough and we'll show how a TAM Report hands off into the next quarterly review.

Book a demo